<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sci-Fi Heaven.net &#187; Firefly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/tag/firefly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scifiheaven.net</link>
	<description>We&#039;re Geeks.  Deal With It.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:28:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Five ways to ruin a perfectly good sci-fi show</title>
		<link>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2010/09/09/five-ways-to-ruin-a-perfectly-good-sci-fi-show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2010/09/09/five-ways-to-ruin-a-perfectly-good-sci-fi-show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris McQuillan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth: Final Conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sliders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stargate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t'pol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voyager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whedon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifiheaven.net/?p=2573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sci-Fi has a long and proud history of cancellation. Perfectly good shows (and plenty of plain awful shows) have seen the axe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2010%2F09%2F09%2Ffive-ways-to-ruin-a-perfectly-good-sci-fi-show%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2010%2F09%2F09%2Ffive-ways-to-ruin-a-perfectly-good-sci-fi-show%2F&amp;source=scifiheaven&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img src="http://www.scifiheaven.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/fiveways.jpg" alt="" title="fiveways" width="600" height="500" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2574" /><br />
Sci-Fi has a long and proud history of cancellation.  Perfectly good shows (and plenty of plain awful shows) have seen the axe for a multitude of different reasons.  Let&#8217;s take a look at five sure-fire ways to ruin a decent show.</p>
<p>1) <strong>Air your show on FOX</strong><br />
As <em>Firefly</em>, <em>The Sarah Connor Chronicles</em> and <em>Dollhouse</em> has shown, quality has no impact on the lifetime of your show if you choose to air it on FOX.  In fact, it would seem that longevity in FOX is inversely proportional to quality.  Firefly was absolute quality.  Just <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&#038;rls=en&#038;q=Firefly+cancelled&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=UTF-8&#038;redir_esc=&#038;ei=DAuJTOaKAYWUjAfx7JiPCA">Google &#8220;firefly cancelled&#8221;</a> to see the outcry.  Dollhouse, although still a good show, wasn&#8217;t near Firefly&#8217;s calibre, and therefore lasted for slightly longer before reaching the same grisly demise.  And let&#8217;s not even get started on <a href="http://hubpages.com/hub/How_Five_Science_Fiction_TV_Series_Were_Destroyed">Sliders</a>!  That&#8217;s it, Fox: create some of the finest science fiction of the last decade before callously shooting it down.  Good call!</p>
<p>2) <strong>Kill off the lead character (or at least get rid of them unceremoniously)</strong><br />
Once they&#8217;re gone, the show can&#8217;t be far behind.  Although <em>Earth: Final Conflict</em> lasted for some time after the death of William Boone, played by Kevin Kilner.  However, when you base your show so firmly around the lead character&#8217;s personality and moral conflicts, you have a huge amount of creative rebuilding and restructuring that is not easy to successfully achieve.  Even Ben Browder&#8217;s introduction to Stargate SG-1 to replace Richard Dean Anderson, although relatively well managed, signalled the beginning of the end for the show (even if it did provide enough energy to delay the inevitable for a year or two)</p>
<p>3) <strong>Go on for too long</strong><br />
Star Trek is probably the finest example.  You can&#8217;t keep producing top quality stories week-in, week-out for fifteen years.  Voyager and Enterprise probably didn&#8217;t need to happen.  Deep Space Nine was tremendous, and after that the franchise should probably have taken three or four years out to refresh and re-energise.  Voyager&#8217;s premise was strong, but it&#8217;s implementation was poor.  As soon as the writer&#8217;s think <a href="http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Fair_Haven_(episode)">creating an incredibly inaccurate Irish village in the holodeck</a> is a good idea, it&#8217;s time to panic.  Being from Ireland, the whole thing was laughable.  And it was never going to be good sci-fi.</p>
<p><img src="http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g49/amunra71/Trek/tpol.jpg" alt="T'Pol" align="center"/></p>
<p>4) <strong>Sex it up!</strong><br />
Ratings are falling, reviews are mediocre, what do you do?  Get your most attractive female cast member to take her clothes off, regardless of the plot making sense.  Nudity is always a winner, right?  Sadly, it&#8217;s not.  Enterprise&#8217;s attempts to &#8220;sex it up&#8221; in season three were, frankly, ludicrous.  Star Trek, according to Gene Roddenberry, was never adverse to lascivious female aliens: Orion slave girls, anyone?  But quite frankly, making Jolene Blalock little more than eye-candy was a poor call.  It didn&#8217;t fit the character, and was blatantly an attempt to attract an audience of hormonal college boys.  Are the same men interested in Jolene Blalock&#8217;s &#8220;assets&#8221; going to care about the ramifications of a temporal anomaly?  I doubt.  Voyager and Enterprise&#8217;s writers made the other cast act like giggling school girls around Jeri Ryan&#8217;s Seven of Nine and Blalock&#8217;s T&#8217;Pol respectively.  It wasn&#8217;t clever, nor effective.</p>
<p>5) <strong>When all else fails, add zombies</strong></p>
<p>Take this: </p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_LTfGuqu05w?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_LTfGuqu05w?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>Note the stirring music, high production values, moral conflict and powerful premise.</p>
<p>Now, take five years later: </p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FabAj1oCg7A?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FabAj1oCg7A?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>Note the alien vampires, poor acting, poor dialogue and little or no moral/emotional conflict whatsoever?  Just gunshots and explosions.  </p>
<p>The decline still brings a tear to my eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2010/09/09/five-ways-to-ruin-a-perfectly-good-sci-fi-show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABC announces V to start in November</title>
		<link>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/08/09/abc-announces-v-to-start-in-november/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/08/09/abc-announces-v-to-start-in-november/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 05:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Traveling With Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis and News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eat rodent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inara serra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeffrey bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim kirkwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kenneth johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morena baccarin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[November 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pasadena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott peters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television critics association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuesday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visitors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/08/09/abc-announces-v-to-start-in-november/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The creators of ABC&#8216;s upcoming V announced Saturday that the show would premiere Tuesday, Nov. 3 in a news conference at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2009%2F08%2F09%2Fabc-announces-v-to-start-in-november%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2009%2F08%2F09%2Fabc-announces-v-to-start-in-november%2F&amp;source=scifiheaven&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="311" alt="" src="http://backseatcuddler.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/v_the_series-35.jpg" width="466" border="0" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">The creators of <a href="http://www.abc.com" target="_blank">ABC</a>&#8216;s upcoming <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1307824/" target="_blank">V</a> announced Saturday that the show would premiere Tuesday, Nov. 3 in a news conference at the <a href="http://tvcritics.org/" target="_blank">Television Critics Association</a> summer press tour in <a href="http://www.ci.pasadena.ca.us/" target="_blank">Pasadena, CA.</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Executive producer <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0068272/" target="_blank">Jeffrey Bell</a> also promised that star <a href="http://morena.taste-of-irony.net/" target="_blank">Morena Baccarin</a>, who played <a href="http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0003813/">Inara Serra</a> in one of my favorite TV shows, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0303461/" target="_blank">Firefly</a>, and now will play the alien leader Anna, will indeed eat a rodent of some kind as in the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0085106/" target="_blank">original 1980’s series</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">&quot;We want to find a way to do it,&quot; Bell said, but added that if the producers simply duplicated the scene from the original miniseries, &quot;been there, done that.&quot; He added that the new show will feature homages to other iconic moments from the original miniseries.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">The new series is a re-imagining of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0425540/" target="_blank">Kenneth Johnson&#8217;s</a> classic 1980s sci-fi miniseries, about the arrival of alien &quot;visitors&quot; who promise to share advanced technology in exchange for friendship, but turn out to have a darker agenda.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Executive producer</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Scott Peters added that the producers were exploring a way to bring some of the original actors into the show, though not necessarily playing the same characters.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">I really hope they can pull this off and make it close to being as good as the original series was with great story lines and actors. We shall see.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify"><a href="http://www.travelingwithjim.org" target="_blank">Jim Kirkwood, Jr.</a></p>
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:aa0766d3-ff31-44d8-9040-92e6188ed0e2" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; float: none; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px; text-align: left">
<div style="text-align: left">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/abc" rel="tag">abc</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/tv" rel="tag">tv</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/science+fiction" rel="tag">science fiction</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/sci-fi" rel="tag">sci-fi</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/v" rel="tag">v</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/tuesday" rel="tag">tuesday</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/November+3" rel="tag">November 3</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/television+critics+association" rel="tag">television critics association</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/pasadena" rel="tag">pasadena</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/ca" rel="tag">ca</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/jeffrey+bell" rel="tag">jeffrey bell</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/morena+baccarin" rel="tag">morena baccarin</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/inara+serra" rel="tag">inara serra</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/firefly" rel="tag">firefly</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/anna" rel="tag">anna</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/eat+rodent" rel="tag">eat rodent</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/kenneth+johnson" rel="tag">kenneth johnson</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/visitors" rel="tag">visitors</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/scott+peters" rel="tag">scott peters</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/jim+kirkwood" rel="tag">jim kirkwood</a></div>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/08/09/abc-announces-v-to-start-in-november/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll:  Joss Whedon&#8217;s Greatest Show</title>
		<link>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/05/02/poll-joss-whedons-greatest-show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/05/02/poll-joss-whedons-greatest-show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 13:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris McQuillan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis and News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joss Whedon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serenity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/05/02/poll-joss-whedons-greatest-show/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img title="joss11" style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; display: inline; margin-left: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="288" alt="joss11" src="http://www.scifiheaven.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/joss11-thumb.jpg" width="204" align="right" border="0" />After last night’s rather wonderful episode of Dollhouse, I think it’s fair to say that Joss Whedon’s latest creation is quickly beginning to find its feet and hit its stride.&#160; Let’s just hope that it’s not too late in the big bad world of television execs.</p>  <p>However, has Dollhouse reached the heights of Whedon’s previous, much-adored shows? </p>  <p></p>  <p></p>  <p>Only you can decide, so vote below and decide definitively which is his greatest creation to date.</p> ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2009%2F05%2F02%2Fpoll-joss-whedons-greatest-show%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2009%2F05%2F02%2Fpoll-joss-whedons-greatest-show%2F&amp;source=scifiheaven&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img src="http://www.scifiheaven.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/joss11-thumb.jpg" title="joss11" style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; display: inline; margin-left: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="288" alt="joss11"  width="204" align="right" border="0" /></p>
<p>After last night’s rather wonderful episode of Dollhouse, I think it’s fair to say that Joss Whedon’s latest creation is quickly beginning to find its feet and hit its stride.&#160; Let’s just hope that it’s not too late in the big bad world of television execs.</p>
<p>However, has Dollhouse reached the heights of Whedon’s previous, much-adored shows? </p>
</p>
<p>Only you can decide, so vote below and decide definitively which is his greatest creation to date.</p>
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
<p><strong>And if you feel like your opinions just can’t be summed up in a simple vote, feel free to discuss it by leaving a comment.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/05/02/poll-joss-whedons-greatest-show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joss Whedon to &#8216;leave television forever&#8217;?</title>
		<link>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/04/13/joss-whedon-to-leave-television-forever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/04/13/joss-whedon-to-leave-television-forever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris McQuillan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joss Whedon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/04/13/joss-whedon-to-leave-television-forever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Slice have claimed that ‘once “Dollhouse” is over, Joss Whedon is leaving TV for good…to pursue creating on-line content along the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2009%2F04%2F13%2Fjoss-whedon-to-leave-television-forever%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2009%2F04%2F13%2Fjoss-whedon-to-leave-television-forever%2F&amp;source=scifiheaven&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p align="justify"><a href="http://www.scifiheaven.net/wp-content/uploads/JossWhedontoleavetelevisionforever_C222/image.png"><img title="image" style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; display: inline; margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="244" alt="image" src="http://www.scifiheaven.net/wp-content/uploads/JossWhedontoleavetelevisionforever_C222/image_thumb.png" width="166" align="right" border="0" /></a> Sci-Fi Slice have <a href="http://www.sliceofscifi.com/2009/02/21/slice-of-scifi-201/" target="_blank">claimed</a> that ‘once “Dollhouse” is over, Joss Whedon is leaving TV for good…to pursue creating on-line content along the lines of “Dr. Horrible.”’.</p>
<p align="justify">Now, there claim has not been sourced, but let’s assume for the moment that it is true:&#160; genre television would surely have lost one of its finest writers, and if ever there was to be a tragedy written about the demise of one of television’s talents at the hands of the executives, surely Joss’s battles with FOX would be right up there.</p>
<p align="justify">Those unfamiliar with Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along-Blog should check its <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr_Horrible" target="_blank">Wikipedia entry</a> for further details, as it does strike me as the sort of thing Joss would be interested in moving towards.&#160; Now that he has his fan following, does he really need the pencil-pushing network television executives telling him how to edit his content?&#160; No goram way.</p>
<p align="justify">Then again, Sci-Fi Slice might not have a source, and might have just made it up.&#160; In which case, disregard this post.</p>
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/04/13/joss-whedon-to-leave-television-forever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video of the Week: Firefly &#8211; The Message &#8211; Funeral Scene</title>
		<link>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/01/06/video-of-the-week-firefly-the-message-funeral-scene/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/01/06/video-of-the-week-firefly-the-message-funeral-scene/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris McQuillan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clip Of The Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/01/06/video-of-the-week-firefly-the-message-funeral-scene/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All I can think is: damn you FOX.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2009%2F01%2F06%2Fvideo-of-the-week-firefly-the-message-funeral-scene%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2009%2F01%2F06%2Fvideo-of-the-week-firefly-the-message-funeral-scene%2F&amp;source=scifiheaven&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
</p>
<p>
<div aligh="center">
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="scid:5737277B-5D6D-4f48-ABFC-DD9C333F4C5D:23277e1b-1f8e-423b-a1d5-b98494907b1d" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">
<div id="c4430e96-dc5b-4340-a057-e25cd38e6d16" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; display: inline;">
<div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32IkldfFvMU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" target="_new"><img src="http://www.scifiheaven.net/wp-content/uploads/VideooftheWeekFireflyTheMessageFuneralSc_1134F/videofc3223ad260a.jpg" galleryimg="no" onload="var downlevelDiv = document.getElementById('c4430e96-dc5b-4340-a057-e25cd38e6d16'); downlevelDiv.innerHTML = &quot;&lt;div&gt;&lt;object width=\&quot;425\&quot; height=\&quot;355\&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=\&quot;movie\&quot; value=\&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/32IkldfFvMU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1\&quot;&gt;&lt;\/param&gt;&lt;param name=\&quot;wmode\&quot; value=\&quot;transparent\&quot;&gt;&lt;\/param&gt;&lt;embed src=\&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/32IkldfFvMU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1\&quot; type=\&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash\&quot; wmode=\&quot;transparent\&quot; width=\&quot;425\&quot; height=\&quot;355\&quot;&gt;&lt;\/embed&gt;&lt;\/object&gt;&lt;\/div&gt;&quot;;" alt=""></a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>All I can think is: damn you FOX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/01/06/video-of-the-week-firefly-the-message-funeral-scene/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

