<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sci-Fi Heaven.net &#187; FOX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/tag/fox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scifiheaven.net</link>
	<description>We&#039;re Geeks.  Deal With It.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:28:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Five ways to ruin a perfectly good sci-fi show</title>
		<link>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2010/09/09/five-ways-to-ruin-a-perfectly-good-sci-fi-show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2010/09/09/five-ways-to-ruin-a-perfectly-good-sci-fi-show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris McQuillan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth: Final Conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sliders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stargate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t'pol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voyager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whedon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifiheaven.net/?p=2573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sci-Fi has a long and proud history of cancellation. Perfectly good shows (and plenty of plain awful shows) have seen the axe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2010%2F09%2F09%2Ffive-ways-to-ruin-a-perfectly-good-sci-fi-show%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2010%2F09%2F09%2Ffive-ways-to-ruin-a-perfectly-good-sci-fi-show%2F&amp;source=scifiheaven&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img src="http://www.scifiheaven.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/fiveways.jpg" alt="" title="fiveways" width="600" height="500" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2574" /><br />
Sci-Fi has a long and proud history of cancellation.  Perfectly good shows (and plenty of plain awful shows) have seen the axe for a multitude of different reasons.  Let&#8217;s take a look at five sure-fire ways to ruin a decent show.</p>
<p>1) <strong>Air your show on FOX</strong><br />
As <em>Firefly</em>, <em>The Sarah Connor Chronicles</em> and <em>Dollhouse</em> has shown, quality has no impact on the lifetime of your show if you choose to air it on FOX.  In fact, it would seem that longevity in FOX is inversely proportional to quality.  Firefly was absolute quality.  Just <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&#038;rls=en&#038;q=Firefly+cancelled&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=UTF-8&#038;redir_esc=&#038;ei=DAuJTOaKAYWUjAfx7JiPCA">Google &#8220;firefly cancelled&#8221;</a> to see the outcry.  Dollhouse, although still a good show, wasn&#8217;t near Firefly&#8217;s calibre, and therefore lasted for slightly longer before reaching the same grisly demise.  And let&#8217;s not even get started on <a href="http://hubpages.com/hub/How_Five_Science_Fiction_TV_Series_Were_Destroyed">Sliders</a>!  That&#8217;s it, Fox: create some of the finest science fiction of the last decade before callously shooting it down.  Good call!</p>
<p>2) <strong>Kill off the lead character (or at least get rid of them unceremoniously)</strong><br />
Once they&#8217;re gone, the show can&#8217;t be far behind.  Although <em>Earth: Final Conflict</em> lasted for some time after the death of William Boone, played by Kevin Kilner.  However, when you base your show so firmly around the lead character&#8217;s personality and moral conflicts, you have a huge amount of creative rebuilding and restructuring that is not easy to successfully achieve.  Even Ben Browder&#8217;s introduction to Stargate SG-1 to replace Richard Dean Anderson, although relatively well managed, signalled the beginning of the end for the show (even if it did provide enough energy to delay the inevitable for a year or two)</p>
<p>3) <strong>Go on for too long</strong><br />
Star Trek is probably the finest example.  You can&#8217;t keep producing top quality stories week-in, week-out for fifteen years.  Voyager and Enterprise probably didn&#8217;t need to happen.  Deep Space Nine was tremendous, and after that the franchise should probably have taken three or four years out to refresh and re-energise.  Voyager&#8217;s premise was strong, but it&#8217;s implementation was poor.  As soon as the writer&#8217;s think <a href="http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Fair_Haven_(episode)">creating an incredibly inaccurate Irish village in the holodeck</a> is a good idea, it&#8217;s time to panic.  Being from Ireland, the whole thing was laughable.  And it was never going to be good sci-fi.</p>
<p><img src="http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g49/amunra71/Trek/tpol.jpg" alt="T'Pol" align="center"/></p>
<p>4) <strong>Sex it up!</strong><br />
Ratings are falling, reviews are mediocre, what do you do?  Get your most attractive female cast member to take her clothes off, regardless of the plot making sense.  Nudity is always a winner, right?  Sadly, it&#8217;s not.  Enterprise&#8217;s attempts to &#8220;sex it up&#8221; in season three were, frankly, ludicrous.  Star Trek, according to Gene Roddenberry, was never adverse to lascivious female aliens: Orion slave girls, anyone?  But quite frankly, making Jolene Blalock little more than eye-candy was a poor call.  It didn&#8217;t fit the character, and was blatantly an attempt to attract an audience of hormonal college boys.  Are the same men interested in Jolene Blalock&#8217;s &#8220;assets&#8221; going to care about the ramifications of a temporal anomaly?  I doubt.  Voyager and Enterprise&#8217;s writers made the other cast act like giggling school girls around Jeri Ryan&#8217;s Seven of Nine and Blalock&#8217;s T&#8217;Pol respectively.  It wasn&#8217;t clever, nor effective.</p>
<p>5) <strong>When all else fails, add zombies</strong></p>
<p>Take this: </p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_LTfGuqu05w?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_LTfGuqu05w?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>Note the stirring music, high production values, moral conflict and powerful premise.</p>
<p>Now, take five years later: </p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FabAj1oCg7A?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FabAj1oCg7A?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>Note the alien vampires, poor acting, poor dialogue and little or no moral/emotional conflict whatsoever?  Just gunshots and explosions.  </p>
<p>The decline still brings a tear to my eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2010/09/09/five-ways-to-ruin-a-perfectly-good-sci-fi-show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whedon&#8217;s Dollhouse Trailer Released</title>
		<link>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2008/05/19/whedons-dollhouse-trailer-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2008/05/19/whedons-dollhouse-trailer-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 08:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris McQuillan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis and News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trailer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2008/05/19/whedons-dollhouse-trailer-released/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again, we&#8217;re a few days behind on this one, so apologies for that. But FOX have issued a trailer for Joss [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2008%2F05%2F19%2Fwhedons-dollhouse-trailer-released%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2008%2F05%2F19%2Fwhedons-dollhouse-trailer-released%2F&amp;source=scifiheaven&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Once again, we&#8217;re a few days behind on this one, so apologies for that.</p>
<p>But FOX have issued a trailer for Joss Whedon&#8217;s upcoming series, <strong>&#8216;Dollhouse&#8217;.</strong>&nbsp; Given Whedon&#8217;s track record, this should be pretty good &#8211; and I&#8217;ll give anything of his a shot after &#8216;Firefly&#8217;.&nbsp; Let&#8217;s just hope FOX give the show more than 13 episodes this time.</p>
<div align="center">
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="scid:5737277B-5D6D-4f48-ABFC-DD9C333F4C5D:c30420aa-769b-43cd-9d23-2b5bce7f0317" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">
<div id="c44c7815-0063-468a-9e58-35e4a67b74a2" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; display: inline;">
<div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3ul5EUJWxs&amp;hl=en" target="_new"><img src="http://www.scifiheaven.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/video8c0f44b1685e.jpg" galleryimg="no" onload="var downlevelDiv = document.getElementById('c44c7815-0063-468a-9e58-35e4a67b74a2'); downlevelDiv.innerHTML = &quot;&lt;div&gt;&lt;object width=\&quot;425\&quot; height=\&quot;355\&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=\&quot;movie\&quot; value=\&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/b3ul5EUJWxs&amp;hl=en\&quot;&gt;&lt;\/param&gt;&lt;param name=\&quot;wmode\&quot; value=\&quot;transparent\&quot;&gt;&lt;\/param&gt;&lt;embed src=\&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/b3ul5EUJWxs&amp;hl=en\&quot; type=\&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash\&quot; wmode=\&quot;transparent\&quot; width=\&quot;425\&quot; height=\&quot;355\&quot;&gt;&lt;\/embed&gt;&lt;\/object&gt;&lt;\/div&gt;&quot;;" alt=""></a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div align="left">Enjoy!&nbsp; I know I&#8217;m looking forward to this one. If you&#8217;re looking for more information on the show, the infinite fountain of knowledge that is Wikipedia provides in this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollhouse_%28TV_series%29" target="_blank">article</a>.&nbsp; Also worth noting that FOX is airing both Dollhouse and JJ Abrams&#8217; &#8220;<strong>Fringe</strong>&#8221; with fewer commericial breaks, as part of the new Remote-Free TV initiative.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2008/05/19/whedons-dollhouse-trailer-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American TV Network &#8220;Decisions of the Year&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2007/05/16/american-tv-network-decisions-of-the-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2007/05/16/american-tv-network-decisions-of-the-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 12:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris McQuillan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jericho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stargate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2007/05/16/american-tv-network-decisions-of-the-year/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still bitter about the Jericho cancellation (which hasn&#8217;t been officially announced yet, actually), I found a post on TrekBBS by NX01_Mark. It&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2007%2F05%2F16%2Famerican-tv-network-decisions-of-the-year%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiheaven.net%2Findex.php%2F2007%2F05%2F16%2Famerican-tv-network-decisions-of-the-year%2F&amp;source=scifiheaven&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Still bitter about the Jericho cancellation (which hasn&#8217;t been officially announced yet, actually), I found a post on TrekBBS by <strong>NX01_Mark</strong>.  It&#8217;s his list of the &#8220;best&#8221; decisions taken by US TV Networks this year (edited slightly by myself).</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>How To Run A Network</strong></p>
<p>* Let&#8217;s move our most popular show, Lost, to 10pm and then air the first 6 episodes.   Take a six month break before airing the rest.</p>
<p>* Let&#8217;s premiere a new show on FOX, <strong>in April</strong>.</p>
<p>* Let&#8217;s split JERICHO up in two halves with a three month+ break in between episodes 11 and 12, even though the ratings held perfectly well until episode 11.</p>
<p>* Let&#8217;s split up our most succesful night of SCI FI programming and wonder why they are failing.</p>
<p>* Let&#8217;s air half a season of Stargate, then go on a break for 7ish months.  During our ingenious beak the remaining half of the year will air in most other world countries.  When <strong>we</strong> air our half, fans will have downloaded the new episodes from abroad.  Magnificent. :)</p></blockquote>
<p>Most fans could do a better job of running American TV Networks than the current heads of scheduling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2007/05/16/american-tv-network-decisions-of-the-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

